WASHINGTON, D.C., July 16, 2026 — Todd Blanche has defended his independence and legal judgment as he faced intense questioning from senators during his confirmation hearing to become President Donald Trump’s attorney general.

Blanche, a former personal lawyer to Trump who has been serving as acting attorney general, appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee amid concerns from lawmakers over his close relationship with the president and several controversial Justice Department decisions during his tenure.

During the hearing, Blanche rejected accusations that he would simply follow Trump’s instructions and insisted that his decisions as the nation’s top law enforcement official would be guided by the law rather than political loyalty.

“I am not a ‘yes man,’” Blanche told senators as he sought to reassure lawmakers that he would maintain professional independence if confirmed.

Questions Over Trump Relationship

A major focus of the hearing was Blanche’s previous role as Trump’s personal defence attorney. Democratic lawmakers questioned whether his long association with the president could affect his ability to oversee the Justice Department impartially.

Blanche argued that his legal career demonstrates a commitment to professional standards and said representing Trump in private legal matters does not prevent him from serving independently as attorney general.

Republicans on the committee also raised questions but were generally focused on whether Blanche could restore confidence within the department and carry out Trump’s law enforcement priorities.

Controversial Fund and Tax Agreement

Senators questioned Blanche about a proposed $1.8 billion fund connected to claims that Trump and his supporters had been unfairly targeted by government agencies.

The proposal, which critics described as benefiting the president and his allies, became one of the most controversial issues surrounding Blanche’s leadership at the Justice Department.

Blanche said the plan was no longer moving forward, but lawmakers questioned the circumstances surrounding the proposal and whether proper procedures had been followed.

The nominee also faced questions about an agreement involving tax audit protections for Trump and his family. Blanche defended aspects of the arrangement, saying it was based on legal principles rather than personal favouritism.

Epstein Files Controversy

Another major topic during the hearing was the Justice Department’s handling of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein.

Lawmakers criticised the department’s release of records, citing concerns that sensitive information connected to victims had not been properly protected.

Blanche acknowledged concerns surrounding the process and said further reviews could be conducted to address outstanding issues.

Debate Over Justice Department Direction

The confirmation hearing also reflected a wider political battle over the future direction of the Justice Department.

Supporters of Blanche argued that he would help reform an agency they believe became politically influenced during previous administrations. Critics countered that his appointment risked turning the department into an instrument of presidential power.

More than 1,000 former Justice Department employees have reportedly raised objections to Blanche’s nomination, citing concerns about independence and the protection of legal institutions.

January 6 Pardons and Law Enforcement Policy

Blanche was also questioned about the administration’s decision to issue pardons and clemency actions involving individuals convicted in connection with the January 6 Capitol attack.

He defended the president’s constitutional authority to grant pardons while saying that his role as attorney general would involve applying the law fairly.

Confirmation Battle Ahead

Blanche’s confirmation will depend on whether he can secure enough support from Republican senators while addressing concerns from Democrats and some members of his own party.

The hearing highlighted the difficult position facing Trump’s nominee: balancing loyalty to a president who strongly supports him while convincing lawmakers that he can operate independently as head of the Justice Department.

If confirmed, Blanche would take permanent control of an agency at the centre of intense political debates over investigations, executive power and the role of federal law enforcement in American democracy.