On September 11, 2001, a group of terrorists hijacked four airplanes in the United States and piloted two of the ill-fated planes into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, creating a movie-like explosion scene with fire flames and thick black smoke covering the sky.
Image: There’s been countless theories accusing the US government of hiding the real truth behind 9/11 attacks.
The American Airlines Boeing 767 which flew against the World Trade Center in New York City was reportedly loaded with 20,000 gallons of jet fuel.
A third plane destroyed part of the Pentagon building [U.S. military base] in Arlington, Virginia while the fourth plane crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.
About 3,000 lives was lost in the terror attack. The events of September 11 [often called “9/11”] have been described as the worst-ever terrorist attacks against on the U.S. soil.
Investigations revealed that the hijackings were carried out by 19 men — five on each of the first three planes and four on the last, according to reports.
The facts provided on the terrorists revealed all 19 were linked to the terrorist group Al Qaeda, headed by late Osama bin Laden who was said to have operated out of Afghanistan. All 19 jihadists died in the attack.
All said, there’s no doubt that the attack actually happened, but what has been argued by many scholars is “how it happened”. Some believe the US government lied to the world about the tragic events.
To prove the theorists right, an American business mogul named Mr Salo has plans in the pipe, to purchase a Boeing and a skyscraper in order to recreate the bloody terrorist events of September 11, 2001 in the United States of America.
According to this businessman who’s ready to invest a total of $1.5 million in the truth project: “an aluminium airplane cannot damage a steel and concrete building to any great degree…and the government version of 9/11 is preposterous”.
The American citizen Paul Salo wants to separate the truth from the lies, by buying a skyscraper and a Boeing 747 with a black box on board. He will then fuel the airplane and direct it at an abandoned building in order to prove his assertions right.
According to Veteranstoday, after spending 1.5m dollars on this project, the show will pay for itself in case he manages to sell the tickets. A seat in the first row will cost 5,000 dollars for those who care to watch the truth unfold.
With Saudi Arabia’s role in the September 11 attack yet to be fully revealed, as Americans call on Obama and the US Congress to release all 28 pages of the ‘Joint Inquiry Report’, could it possibly be true that the government lied?
Responses To The Proposed Project:
This is a brilliant move.
What happened next at the WTC departed from the expected events at this point:
All such buildings have a structural core of reinforced concrete and steel that houses the bundle of elevator shafts and other services. This is the strongest element of the building. In a large building collapse, the core has to be demolished or it will prevent the building from falling. If the building is to fall at freefall speed on its own footprint, the core will have to be eliminated at least as rapidly. This is typically done with explosives — either one extremely large explosion as the aerial photos of WTC 6 show definitively, or a series of connected small explosions as the videos of WTC 7 clearly show.
I was looking for a movie that was either banned by the US or just never shown in theatres. It was the mother of conspiracy films totally implicated the Bush regime. Ive had no luck finding it.
No planes hit the WTC.
Ian,
Some friends of mine were working on the Hudson Bergen Light Rail construction across the river. They didn’t see the first one hit, but they were staring at the WTC when they claim the second one hit. I watched it in real time on TV. What actually happened?
We can’t be 100% sure but most likely it was a cruise missile and they used some sort of hologram. There was a military cargo plane flying around at the time that could have projected the hologram. The video footage is clearly faked, that’s why the plane just disappears into the building – it wasn’t real.
He needs to buy a steel cored skyscraper then fit a Boutique Shaped Charge Mini Nuke 350t MRR (Minimum Residual Radiation) type 3rd-4th gen to the center columns at the 81 floor with lots of extra steel bracing. Then a few other more conventional mini nukes around the mechanical floors and basement. That should do it nicely!
“COGNITIVE DISSONANCE” is everybody’s problem. Check out its definition!!!!
+++ Ask questions like this in YouTube & check out few clips::::
9/11 Missiles Heading Toward WTC Towers?
Missiles which Rebekah Roth discussed filmed in this clip in::::
YouTube::::
9 11 World Trade Center Attack YouTube Banned this Video World Wide
It also discusses RKM & how RKM-CARTEL pulled off 9/11++ but::::
Main thing new in this clip is @11.30 the real UAL 175 decoy plane shown flying away from WTC @ moment of second explosion (MISSILE).
+++ Like Jesse Ventura always says::::
Only people who know the real 9/11 story are the criminals who “PULLED IT”!!!!
cheers -lc
BTW:::: This airliner ran out of fuel midair & couldn’t make it to target on 9/11 as seen in
YouTube::::
Matrix glitch – Holographic plane suspended in mid-air – Caught on camera!
It’s pretty clear what happens when a large plane hits a very solidly built skyscraper. I can refer him to videos of two such planes hitting the WTC:
The plane breaks up as it passes through the steel skeleton of the building. There is extensive damage to the soft walls, skin, and some of the structural elements of the building. An entry hole of the same size and shape as the cross section of the plane becomes visible on the relatively soft facade of the building.
None, or practically none of the debris makes it through the building and out the other side. The initial damage is repairable. A fire breaks out as the fuel ignites. It emits black smoke, indicating that the confined space of the building is not allowing complete combustion due to lack of oxygen. The fire will thus not be hot enough to melt steel or cause catastrophic damage to concrete.
This is why no skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire. All of this makes excellent theatre, which is probably why the two planes hit the two towers.
Excellent theatre is also what this guy is trying to recreate.
I know no planes hit Shanksville, the Pentagon or WTC 6 and WTC 7.
I was unders he he impression the planes hit 1&2 but the demolition was carried out by mininukes.
I’ve seen that on youtube. I’m unconvinced because it would be inpossible to holigram all that kerosene that is visibly burning at the crash site. The hole and smoke looks a lot like the one that resulted from the WW2 bomber hitting the Empire State Building. The plane would come apart but continue into the building till it hit the core.
It was travelling at hundreds of miles an hour. It won’t just stop like a dart hitting a dartboard it will come apart as it makes its way through structural columns but every piece will leep hoing till it huts the wall of the core in the middle.
That’s what makes sense to me.
I think the theory kicking about that they were not passenger jets carrying missiles in a pod, fired 0.3 seconds before impact has some merit.
That been said it is a new one to me, so I better hang fire on it for now.
He will need to use either a Boeing 757 or 767, not a 747 (which is a 4 engine Jumbo jet).
Not only is it a great idea, but it will finally shed light on the anti-hijack remote flight control systems used to remotely fly the drones into the towers on 9/11 (see patent – google.com/patents/US6641087)
This remote system was also used to Hijack MH370 and fly it to Diego Garcia in order to kidnap the Chinese workers and steal the patent rights for Freescale Electronics semi-conductor technologies.
Next time you hear you hear some idiot say a plane hit the pentagram, tell them to go to y-tube and type in F4 Phantom vs wall.
BRAVO::::
AWESOME IDEA PAUL SALO.
Nothing is better than a real-life scale test like this plan.
Of course long long ago same results could’ve come with scaled down models (say::: 1000 times scaled down building + drone) but was NOT done cuz everyone knew whole thing was scam & even a full fuel-tanker plane flying into a building would fall down outside it like a coke can slammed at a cement wall @ 2-300 mph & looking more like shredded aluminum in a recycling yard!!!!!
BTW::::
In 2002 I had thought of pulling off such scaled down crash tests but couldn’t afford it!
Even those who could didn’t do it (like Jesse Ventura +++)!!!!
That’s a brilliant analogy, slam the coke can against the cement wall, and let’s see if it can penetrate it.
Also the Saudi connection is becoming highly relevant, with the recent push to release the 28 pages. There were no Saudi hijackers on the airplanes, because there were no airplanes in the first place.
only way he’ll re-create the event is with a lot of mini neutron bombs.
the money would be better spent campaigning about WTC-7
NO Captain:::: he wants to prove impossibility of planes destroying buildings.
Thats also what Saudi Arabia Royal Lizards need to do to defend against bogus Saudi hijacker claims. Thats how legal defense works in this country by disproving a charged offense.
NO ONE but RKM know full details of weapons deployed in WTCs that day so NO ONE could recreate those events but those who pulled it off.
Brilliant idea, it will show the 9-11-2001 fraud. When the plane hits the iron+ concrete and defragmentizes into a billion pieces, we will get the real view of a crashing JumboJet into a highrise.
Only the engines may cause a tiny hole, the rest defragmentizes.
We never saw any Youtube vid showing de plane defragmentizing… Only VANISHING into the building, a clear photoshop.
If i was that guy, i would be looking under my car before i start it.
I’m looking forward to seeing the plane bounce off. He can make a fortune from the film rights.
But Howie is right, this brave guy will not live long enough to stage the show. However, we should salute his courage for trying and pat him on the back while he is still around to enjoy the appreciation.
Distinguished scholars like David Ray Griffin exposed the 9/11 lie in his exhaustive research and writings. In numerous books, articles, and lectures, he provided convincing evidence about an inside job, not an attack carried out by “crazed Arabs”, Rense wrote.
In an April 5, 2006 lecture titled, “9/11: The Myth and the Reality,” he concluded saying:
“It would seem, for many reasons, that the official story of 9/11, which has served as a religious Myth in the intervening years (and still does), is a myth in the pejorative sense of a story that does not correspond to reality.”
It was Griffin’s polite way of calling it a Big Lie, the biggest of our time.
On September 11, 2008, his Global Research article headlined, “September 11, 2001: 21 Reasons to Question the Official Story about 9/11,” including:
(1) Although the Big Lie holds Osama bin Laden accountable, the FBI admitted it “has no hard evidence connecting” him to the attack (NPHR 206-11).
(2) Although the 9/11 myth claims “devout Muslims (were) ready to die as martyrs to earn a heavenly reward, Mohamed Atta (their alleged leader) and the other alleged hijackers regularly drank heavily, went to strip clubs, and paid for sex (NPHR 153-55).”
(3) Claimed cell phone calls from above 30,000 feet to relatives were falsified as technology at the time made completely them impossible. Later, the FBI changed its story, saying only two were made “from United 93 after it descended to 5,000 feet (NPHR 111-17).”
(4) Then “US Solicitor General Tel Olson’s claim that his wife, Barbara Olson, phoned him twice from AA 77,” saying hijackers controlled the plane, “was also contradicted by this FBI report,” saying one call she attempted was “unconnected” and lasted “0 seconds (NPRH 60-62).”
(5) The FBI lied, saying Atta’s left behind luggage included “decisive evidence that al-Qaeda was responsible for the attacks….(NPHR 155-62).”
(6) Evidence of alleged Al Qaeda videos, “passports discovered at the crash sites, and a headband discovered at the crash site of United 93 (showed) clear signs of having been fabricated (NPHR 170-73).”
(7) Evidence shows hijackers WERE NOT on the planes. Moreover, if they broke “into cockpits, the pilots would have ‘squawked’ the universal highjack code,” a simple two second act. However, none aboard the four flights did it (NPHR 175-79).
(8) Standard operating procedures to intercept “planes showing signs of an in-flight emergency within about 10 minutes” weren’t followed. Instead, a “stand-down order prevented (them) from being carried out (NPHR 1-10, 81-84).”
(9) Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta said Dick Cheney, inside the White House bunker, “apparently confirmed a stand-down order at about 9:25AM,” prior to an alleged plane striking the Pentagon. “Another man has reported hearing a member of LAX Security learn that a stand-down order (came) from the ‘highest level’ of the White House (NPHR 94-96).”
(14) Pentagon officials lied, saying they had no warning of an approaching aircraft. In fact, “a military E-4B – the Air Force’s most advanced communications, command, and control airplane – was flying over the White House at the time.” Astonishingly, the Pentagon “denied it belonged to them (NPHR 96-98).”
Moreover, the Pentagon is the most guarded structure in the world, complete with advanced radar and surface-to-air missiles, able to intercept and destroy any approaching threat.
(15) Without explanation, the Secret Service let George Bush remain at a Sarasota, FL school for 30 minutes after learning the second tower was struck, ignoring standard procedures to secure his safety as presumably high-value officials were targeted.
Only advance knowledge assured them of no danger at a time media reports circulated about America being under attack.
On 9/11’s first anniversary, a new White House story emerged, falsely claiming Bush left the school immediately. “The lie was told in major newspapers and on MSNBC and ABC television (NHHR 129-31).”
(21) Growing numbers of “physicists, chemists, architects, engineers, pilots, former military officers, and former intelligence officers” reject the official 9/11 myth as a bald-faced lie (NPHR xi).
